[ad_1]
Gujarat Excessive Court docket on Thursday got here down closely on the state authorities over the quantum of compensation given to the kin of the victims of the Morbi bridge collapse that killed 135 individuals.
The Excessive Court docket noticed that the compensation given to kin of the deceased is much less. HC stated that “compensation must be reasonable and in addition the necessity of the hour is paying acceptable compensation”.
The compensation paid to critically injured can also be low, the courtroom noticed and directed the state to file an in depth affidavit and are available out with a coverage for compensation.
The courtroom additionally ordered the state authorities to do a survey of all bridges within the state. It requested the state to make sure bridges are in correct situation. The courtroom stated it needs a listing of all bridges within the state and their situation and that there must be a licensed report, which must be positioned earlier than it.
Rusty cables, damaged anchor pins, and free bolts had been among the many lapses that weren’t addressed whereas renovating the suspension bridge in Morbi which collapsed final month into the Machchhu river killing 135 individuals, as per a preliminary probe by the Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL). The FSL report additionally identified that the brand new metallic flooring elevated the load of the bridge. In keeping with the prosecution, each the repairing contractors weren’t certified to hold out such restore and renovation work.
Police have to this point arrested 9 individuals together with 4 from the Oreva group that was managing the British-era suspension bridge, which collapsed on October 30.
Orvea Group had employed Dhrangadhra-based Dev Prakash Answer to renovate the bridge, which collapsed 4 days after it was thrown open to the general public post-renovation.
As per the First Data Report, at the least 250 to 300 individuals had been current on the bridge when it collapsed after one of many cables snapped.
The report additionally revealed that the Oreva Group didn’t rent any professional company to evaluate the load-bearing capability of the bridge earlier than throwing it open to the general public.
”The group had offered 3,165 tickets on October 30 alone and there was no coordination between ticket reserving places of work on each side of the bridge,” stated district authorities pleader Vijay Jani.
He stated the reserving clerks, who’re below arrest, ought to have stopped the sale of tickets after an extent however they continued to promote tickets and allowed extra individuals to go on the bridge.
The defence knowledgeable the courtroom that three safety guards had been on obligation on the day of the tragedy, two on each side of the bridge and one in the course of the construction. Whereas two of the three guards are in custody, the third one fell into the river however survived.
With inputs from businesses
Source link
